Ai niin, ja kuulemma täältä WordPress.comin kojelaudaltakin löytyy jonninlainen Readeri.

What are some good web RSS readers to replace google reader? Netvibes on… erilainen, Feedlyä ja Newsbluria on paljon kehuttu, jälkimmäinen vaikutti pikatestissäni hyvältä (mutta päädyin silti TSI-ratkaisuun).

Pisteet: 56/130

Olit parempi pomo kuin
1 prosenttia
vastaajista.

Tämä meni ihan niin kuin pitikin.

Kokemukseni mukaan kyvykäs mutta johtamishaluton johtaja voi olla paljon parempi kuin johtamishaluinen, mutta muutoin -kyvytön. Se -haluton ei tosin ehkä jaksa pallillaan kovin pitkään, mutta muutoin kyvykkäänä huolehtii operaation sujuvuudesta oman aikansa ja todennäköisesti vielä poissiirtymänsäkin ajalta.

Any chance of tweaking it so that I could give +1’s to articles irrespective of and in addition to sharing them in G+ posts? From what I can tell, giving +1’s isn’t currently supported by the plugin.

Google Reader had +1 tied to sharing so that in order to share on G+ I had to +1 it first. That was okay but not entirely optimal: +1 and posting on G+ about something could IMHO very well be two separate functions, so that you could

* only +1 something
* only share it in a G+ post
* do both if you like

As a workaround for 12.04, here’s a command that replaces the settings file with an unwritable empty one that seems to prevent the issue from occurring:

$ rm -f ~/.openyahtzee && touch ~/.openyahtzee && chmod -w ~/.openyahtzee

This obviously prevents you from saving any settings, but then again you can’t utilize saved settings with the buggy version anyway.

To revert the workaround, remove the unwritable dummy file with:

$ rm -f ~/.openyahtzee

Newsblur (joka on kuulemma perustettu jo vuosia sitten tätä päivää ennakoiden) vaikutti pikaisella kokeilulla lupaavalta, mutta tämän TSI-miehen vei lopulta Tiny Tiny RSS. Ennen Readeria käytin jonkin aikaa Netvibesia, joka on vieläkin olemassa. Readeriin tottuneen täytyy kylläkin Netvibesissa opetella tyystin erilainen tyyli kuluttaa sisältöä.

Came here to comment on this: Brady obviously posed that question from the layman perspective, which confuses chaotic with random, and unfortunately the physicist in his response didn’t directly address the confusion. It would have been valuable to clear it up right there, now the confused people probably leave the video with their confusion still in place. Here’s hoping there’ll be a follow-up video on this topic (if there isn’t already), chaos theory is one of my favorite subjects!

Also I like annoying Apple fans.

That was so unexpected I almost had a heart attack.

No offence, but pornography is the last thing you’ll want to recommend for reliable, anatomically correct demonstration of this (too). There may be such material, but as with almost every factual subject in porn, it’s overwhelmed by stuff where it’s faked (in all kinds of dumb, obvious and less obvious ways), so for someone looking to educate themselves, they better look elsewhere.

That is one long stone corridor.