I suggest that the title be changed to reflect that this is related to g_spawn_async_with_pipes() too
I suggest that the title be changed to somehow reflect that this is (apparently indirectly) related to g_spawn_async_with_pipes() too. I was about to report a duplicate with the title this bug initially had, and I see others have fallen for it too (Ref: Bug #904899). As it stands, bug reporters have to catch g_spawn_async_with_pipes() from a greyed-out comment made by a bot. I think some confusion could be avoided if Launchpad, when suggesting this, had g_spawn_async_with_pipes() right in the title. How about ”deja-dup-monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in child_setup(), g_spawn_async_with_pipes()”?