I tried my hands on the Snake, and was quickly defeated. It’s an ugly mess currently from the point of view of an international beginner: 2.5 (Lenny’s version) doesn’t work too well with unicode, and 3.0 isn’t yet in the repos. Ubuntu 8.10 has the basic 3.0 interpreter, but that failed me at the beginning of the 3rd chapter. Apparently the examples there require Tk, which for 3.0 isn’t in the repos.
I was surprised by the somewhat flaky unicode support in 2.5. This was due to my misconception that Python was new — newer than Java for instance. As I have no background in Python, and no code to support either, I’m just happy they’ve fixed this in version 3.
Päivitin kaikki WordPress-blogit 2.7:ään. Siinä ilmeni, ettei SVN-päivittäminen pelaa kovin hyvin, jos teemana on kustomoitu default: SVN täyttää muokatut tiedostot muokkauksia ihmettelevistä kommenteista (
<<<<<<< .mine) ja hakemiston
.mine-päätteisistä varmuuskopioista (tjsp.).
En keksinyt tähän äkkiseltään parempaakaan ratkaisua kuin kopioida (
cp -a) kustomoidun teeman kokonaan uudelle nimelle, tuhota
.mine-tiedostot ja nuo SVN:n lisäämät kommentit (
sed -i '/blaablaa/d') kopiosta, sen jälkeen tuhota default-hakemiston kaikkineen (
rm -rf) ja lopuksi noutaa uuden kopion alkuperäisestä defaultista SVN:llä (
Just filed my first Debian bug — yay! And a boo to reportbug for not wrapping the lines and failing to mention it. Either would have resulted in a nicer layout on the web page: I could have wrapped the lines myself, had I known this. Oh well, I’ll know next time.
Also, despite picking ‘novice’ mode in reportbug’s initial configuration, I was confused by the SMTP question “Do you have a “mail transport agent” (MTA) like Exim, Postfix or SSMTP configured on this computer to send mail to the Internet?” Since exim4 is installed by default, I picked the default (yes), and this resulted in my first report being lost, a fact which I could only verify by looking at exim’s log (which a true novice probably couldn’t do). There was no error message, and even worse, reportbug claimed to have sent the report successfully when it had in fact not done so.
But anyway, I was fortunate to spot the broken link on debian.org, as that was a perfect excuse for finally trying this bugreporting thingy.
Some issues with RIAs I’ve been wondering:
- How come there’s no Flash-based Ogg player? Actually, it seems that a Vorbis player is being worked on, which is great, but I’m still puzzled that this hasn’t come about way, way earlier.
- How come there’s no Flash-based Ogg player that would work with the free Flash player implementations? Granted that having one that works with the non-free plugin, which is the most prevalent, is of massively bigger importance for spreading Ogg, than having a fully freedom-friendly one. And also, those of us who choose to use the free implementations probably have no problems playing back Oggs without a Flash-based player. However, I’m not trying to be critical here; these are just issues that I find confusing in how the free software community works. (More on this below.)
- Is Flash a non-free format? Is there such a thing as a ‘non-free format’, or am I just confused in my terminology?
- Are there any truly free RIA platforms? I know of none. Based on what I understand from the Wikipedia article, Moonlight can hardly be considered one, given its MS-imposed restrictions.
- If there aren’t any truly free RIA platforms, why not?
As I said, this isn’t a criticism. I’m just genuinely puzzled by these questions and how the community works. More generally, I would presume that it would be natural for those striving to free people from non-free formats and software, to begin from their own side of things (the free software world), and from there to reach towards those still locked in. This would pave a nice, finished road for the unfree to flock back to the other side with them.
Let’s say a locked-in user comes to contact with Ogg through a Flash-based player on the web. They then, through proper evangelising, start to contemplate switching to a free Flash player. But if the free player can’t play the Ogg files displayed on their favourite sites, they face the added difficulty of having to try and get them to play otherwise.
If, instead, they’d find that the free Flash implementation they’ve now switched to plays the Ogg player just fine, they won’t have to go through the hoop of getting the Oggs to play otherwise — at least not until they start contemplating ditching Flash altogether for being a non-free format.
And what about ditching Flash, if you still want to have RIAs in your truly free world? With Ogg itself it seems to me that the work began as it should have, with laying the foundations by creating a free alternative. But what if there’s no free alternative for the non-free RIA platforms?