Viestialustana vianhallintajärjestelmät

Changed formatting of array index calculation in 3.13.0: intended or not?

11. maaliskuuta 2026 klo 8.35
Sijainti: Vianhallintajärjestelmät: Github
Avainsanat: shfmt

With the same arguments given, output differs between 3.12.0 and 3.13.0, as demonstrated in the example below. I didn’t see this mentioned directly in the release notes, so I was wondering if this is an intentional change or a bug. I don’t mind the change per se, but just wanted to be sure that it’s permanent before I adjust all my existing scripts to conform to the newer way shfmt prefers this.

$ cat asdf
#!/bin/bash

array=(
    "a"
    "b"
    "c"
)

value="${array[${#array[@]} - 1]}"

printf "%s\n" "${value}"

$ /usr/local/bin/archive/shfmt/shfmt_v3.12.0_linux_amd64 -i 4 -ci -l -d asdf # no output

$ /usr/local/bin/archive/shfmt/shfmt_v3.13.0_linux_amd64 -i 4 -ci -l -d asdf
asdf
diff asdf.orig asdf
--- asdf.orig
+++ asdf
@@ -6,6 +6,6 @@
     "c"
 )
 
-value="${array[${#array[@]} - 1]}"
+value="${array[${#array[@]}-1]}"
 
 printf "%s\n" "${value}"

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Github)

Looks like patchset 2026-01-07 [1] should at least have the WoL issue fixed

27. helmikuuta 2026 klo 13.15
Sijainti: Vianhallintajärjestelmät: Launchpad
Avainsanat: Linux

Looks like patchset 2026-01-07 [1] should at least have the WoL issue fixed: ”net: ipv4: fix regression in local-broadcast routes” (more in [2]). Whether this helps with the other, ”Network is unreachable” issues, I wouldn’t know.

*[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2137664
*[2] https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/20250822165231.4353-4-bacs@librecast.net/

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Launchpad)

So that’s what was causing all these weird network issues all of a sudden here

26. helmikuuta 2026 klo 20.17
Sijainti: Vianhallintajärjestelmät: Launchpad
Avainsanat: Linux, Ubuntu

So that’s what was causing all these weird network issues all of a sudden here. Looks like 6.8.0-101-generic is likewise affected.

Sending wake-on-LAN packets also broke for me coincidentally with this. That is, my NAS (now also running 6.8.0-101) could still receive WOL packets sent from a server running 6.8.0-79, but none sent from my desktop (running 6.8.0-101). After downgrading the desktop back to 6.8.0-94, WOL packets sent from it were again immediately picked up by the NAS.

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Launchpad)

Playback broken by incoming call

8. helmikuuta 2026 klo 16.56
Sijainti: Vianhallintajärjestelmät: Github

Still an issue in Matheria 7.2.2.4 (server version 32.0.5).

This also manifests a bit differently when using the lock screen player: resuming playback after the call actually skips back to to the start of a previously played track instead of resuming the current one (from where you were when the call came in). The player even shows the current track title, despite playing a different one.

Steps to reproduce this variant:

  1. have a directory with two audio files, 1.m4a and 2.m4a
  2. start to play 2.m4u
  3. lock the screen
  4. call the phone (just have it ring, then hang up)
  5. resume playback from the lock screen

Expected behaviour

Playback of 2.m4a resumes from where it was when the call came in

Actual behaviour

The player beings to play 1.m4a from the start (but claims to play 2.m4a)

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Github)

SIGSEGV in wl_resource_get_version() again

30. lokakuuta 2025 klo 18.38
Sijainti: Vianhallintajärjestelmät: Launchpad
Avainsanat: Totem

This happened again, and the only common factor with the one above was Totem playing a video again (this time I wasn’t messing with the timeline, just watching).

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Launchpad)

gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in wl_resource_get_version()

21. lokakuuta 2025 klo 19.40
Sijainti: Vianhallintajärjestelmät: Launchpad
Avainsanat: Gnome, Kdenlive, Totem

I was editing a video in Kdenlive (in that I had the project open on my first monitor), and was simultaneously scrubbing one of the input clips on my second monitor using Totem, when the crash occurred.

Not much further info at the moment that I can think of. Just making this initial report so that I have something to refer to, should a similar crash occur again.

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Launchpad)

Prebuilt binaries missing from Release 4.7.1

7. lokakuuta 2025 klo 12.36
Sijainti: Vianhallintajärjestelmät: Github
Avainsanat: Github, Motion

4.7.1 was released three weeks ago, but as I’m writing this, prebuilt binaries have yet to appear on the release page. Maybe the build jobs have failed?

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Github)

I’m still getting federated posts from updating old ones

6. lokakuuta 2025 klo 16.03
Sijainti: Vianhallintajärjestelmät: Github
Avainsanat: Mastodon, WordPress

I’m still getting federated posts from updating old ones on my blog (with the plugin now at version 7.5.0). Not every time, but something like four out of maybe two dozen that I edited today (from 2018) have so far appeared on Mastodon.

Should I open a new report? I noticed the merged PR (above) mentions the block editor, whereas I’m using the classic editor.

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Github)

Disable federating updates

24. syyskuuta 2025 klo 16.30
Sijainti: Vianhallintajärjestelmät: Github
Avainsanat: Mastodon, WordPress

What

A checkbox on the settings page to optionally disable federating updates of existing posts.

Why

Previously:

If you edit an old post, that is not yet on mastodon, then it is technically an Update Activity but it shows up on Mastodon after the Update, so Mastodon seem to handle Updates without the updated timestamp as an Create.

I edit old posts (from before installing this plugin) every now and then, and find it pretty awkward when this causes those posts to show up on Mastodon as if they were new — more so than not federating updates at all. That’s why I’d like to have that option: to be able to disable federating updates altogether.

Only federating updates for posts that have already shown up on Mastodon would be a better solution, but also a bit more complex I believe. (It’d require some way to keep track of this status, as also mentioned in the issue that the quote above is from.)

How

No response

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Github)

This was a conflict between the new integration and the third party integration I had been using up until now

17. syyskuuta 2025 klo 13.57
Sijainti: Vianhallintajärjestelmät: Github
Avainsanat: Home Assistant, Sleep as Android

Okay, this was a conflict between the new integration and the third party integration I had been using up until now. I did uninstall the old integration before trying to setup the new one, but apparently that wasn’t enough; I also had to manually purge all references to sleep_as_android (both old and new) from .storage/core.entity_registry. Only after that (and core restart) the setup showed the webhook URL as expected.

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Github)

« Uudempia - Vanhempia »