I now tried it in Natty, and while at it, in Oneiric as well. In both, GIMP still does exhibit the problem.

I gave it a spin in Natty and yes, the issue is still there. Also, the upstream bug I mentioned seems to be the right one for this, as the discussion there also involves Jamendo’s Ogg streams. I’ll update this one accordingly.

What’s worse is qtpfsgui suggests (or whines, as Darxus more eloquently put it) I look into documentation, and there it tells me ”Linux users have to checkout [hugin] project’s subversion repository and compile the sources”. Perhaps it was helpful at one point, but now it’s so outdated it’s become badly misleading.

(This on Lucid, at least.)

Hi,

The Pinta PPA description currently says: ”It’s goal”. It should say ”Its goal”. (Description inside the package itself has this right.)

Is the PPA still being maintained? I’m asking because ppa:nilarimogard/webupd8 currently has version 0.8-1, but I’d rather use your PPA because Pinta’s all I’m interested in.

According to upstream this has been fixed in Gnome 3.0.

The second paragraph of the package description says ”It’s modular concept is intended to provide”. It should say ”Its modular concept is intended to provide”.

I’m attaching a trivial patch, the first one I’ve ever uploaded to Launchpad, just to see if I did it right, and would appreciate any feedback.

I think the bug manifests itself differently depending on the underlying graphics hardware: I’ve heard a report about the colors being wrong on an Intel platform, whereas on my Radeon trying to play YouTube videos since Friday resulted in my LCD going to power saving mode and not waking up anymore.

Disabling hardware acceleration solved both issues.

If I’m reading it correctly, the submitter actually wants gedit to wrap the text at the *right margin*, and it still doesn’t do so in Lucid. That makes this a duplicate of #329500.

Okay, shouldn’t this be marked as duplicate of #10905 then? I’ll do that just now, revert if you feel differently.

Sebastien, I interpret your comment meaning this is a duplicate, but I don’t see another bug connected to this. Was this intentional or did you just forget? I’d like to subscribe to the one you think this is a duplicate of, but can’t see which one it is.