I know you can’t, I’m just honestly confused by your previous comment. Sorry for boring you; I was genuinely interested in your reasoning (just as I am in /u/canyoufixmyspacebar’s for their viewpoint).

Now I’m confused. I thought you considered calling rocks ”blind” was misusing the term ”blindness” because that was not what it was intended to describe; now you say ”atheism” applied to animals is the same? Obviously I’m misunderstanding something.

So would it be accurate to say that you consider animals as atheists for 1) having belief systems & 2) their belief systems not containing anything we’d call ”gods”? If so, how do we know whether 2) is true?

What about rocks? They clearly aren’t theists either. I’m not being dickish here, I think this is interesting semantics and I have no strong inclination either way.

I can, but it’ll be hard to get definitive evidence as the phenomenon can be quite elusive, and I cannot run the daily for very long periods (as it gets in the way of productivity). Obviously, if I catch it even once on the daily, it’ll be proof enough that the issue persists, but on the other hand, not seeing the issue may just mean it didn’t happen to occur during the time running from the daily.

(Upgrading the system to latest release would be a surer way to find out, but for now I intend to keep running 12.04 until the next LTS, 16.04.)

And my axe

Hi Christopher, the apport-collected data above was gathered from my main desktop, which only has Intel graphics. (I mentioned the other system with Radeon just because it *didn’t* suffer from this problem despite having the same software. I no longer have access to that system so unfortunately I can’t provide the same logs from it for comparision.)

Not speaking for The Chromium Projects or anyone, but I think the things you mention are just not considered issues to be addressed in the project. The Chromium Projects are, by their own words, ”open-source”, which by FSF’s definition (as also mentioned in one of the threads you linked to) is different from free software. Barring any actual non-free licensing issues, any party with an interest to do so should, in my understanding, be able to branch a new project from Chromium and address those issues, turning their branched codebase into what the FSF and Trisquel would then consider free enough to qualify.

In other words, these aren’t issues to be fixed ”by Chromium”, but by parties with an interest to have them fixed. And at least according to G4JC at the aforementioned thread, it would be quite a substantial amount of work to be done.

Are their names supposed to be redacted? ’Cause I can read them just fine through the red strikethroughs.

Hassua: itse muistan Dourifin tästä X-fileestä, mutten B5:stä lainkaan. Piti ihan guuglata kuvia jälkimmäisestä, eikä niistäkään herännyt mitään muistikuvia.

Tuo kuvan kohtaus oli kyllä tosissaan karmiva, hui sentään.