Is there any way to combine the two-step method into one pipe?
Is there any way to combine the two-step method into one pipe? To output the raw bitstream to stdout, and remux from stdin?
Is there any way to combine the two-step method into one pipe? To output the raw bitstream to stdout, and remux from stdin?
WordPress should not display private posts in public RSS feeds, except for those privileged users you mentioned, and even they need to be viewing the feed in a browser where they’ve logged in to your site. If your WordPress does display private posts in the feed for everybody, there’s something wrong; perhaps a misbehaving plugin or theme.
[Since version 4.1.6](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/how-to-disable-mshots-service/#post-12939728), Akismet has a filter which [allows you to turn off the site preview popups](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/how-to-disable-mshots-service/#post-12944077) (”mShots”):
function disable_akismet_mshots( $value ) {
return false;
}
add_filter( ’akismet_enable_mshots’, ’disable_akismet_mshots’ );
This doesn’t work with hidden files in Bash, unless you shopt -s dotglob
first.
@Gilles’SO-stopbeingevil’ Ok, it was just my misunderstanding then; I interpreted the quote as meaning ”you should quote RHS regular expressions”.
”Except that you do need double quotes where a pattern or regular expression is expected: on the right-hand side of =
or ==
or !=
or =~
.” Perhaps I’m misunderstanding this, but AFAIK, a RHS regular expression (i.e. after =~
) should always be unquoted (since Bash 3.2 at least).
Perhaps related: RH Bug 626427 – Frequent dhclient DHCPREQUEST messages in syslog
None of these work with NFS mountpoints.
From what romainl only linked to (the relevant parts of links should be quoted when answering):
You can tell syntastic which checkers to run for a given filetype by setting a variable ’g:syntastic__checkers’ to a list of checkers, e.g.
let g:syntastic_php_checkers = [”php”, ”phpcs”, ”phpmd”]
As for your question about invocation: according to the FAQ, the ”command line is constructed using an internal function named makeprgBuild()
, which provides a number of options that allow you to customise every part of the command that gets run. You can set these options using global variables”. (See this answer.)
But how does the latter scenario differ from one where `mktemp` is invoked without `-u`? Even if the file is created (as opposed to just the name), nothing prevents another process from writing to the same file once it has been created.