Viestit paikassa Stack Exchange

Is there any way to combine the two-step method into one pipe?

15. toukokuuta 2021 klo 21.14
Sijainti: Muut: Stack Exchange
Avainsanat: ffmpeg

Is there any way to combine the two-step method into one pipe? To output the raw bitstream to stdout, and remux from stdin?

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Stack Exchange)

WordPress should not display private posts in public RSS feeds, except for those privileged users

23. maaliskuuta 2021 klo 13.29
Sijainti: Muut: Stack Exchange
Avainsanat: RSS, WordPress, yksityisyys

WordPress should not display private posts in public RSS feeds, except for those privileged users you mentioned, and even they need to be viewing the feed in a browser where they’ve logged in to your site. If your WordPress does display private posts in the feed for everybody, there’s something wrong; perhaps a misbehaving plugin or theme.

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Stack Exchange)

Akismet has a filter which allows you to disable the site preview popups

3. tammikuuta 2021 klo 14.55
Sijainti: Muut: Stack Exchange
Avainsanat: Akismet, WordPress

[Since version 4.1.6](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/how-to-disable-mshots-service/#post-12939728), Akismet has a filter which [allows you to turn off the site preview popups](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/how-to-disable-mshots-service/#post-12944077) (”mShots”):

function disable_akismet_mshots( $value ) {
return false;
}
add_filter( ’akismet_enable_mshots’, ’disable_akismet_mshots’ );

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Stack Exchange)

This doesn’t work with hidden files in Bash

5. lokakuuta 2020 klo 16.19
Sijainti: Muut: Stack Exchange
Avainsanat: Bash

This doesn’t work with hidden files in Bash, unless you shopt -s dotglob first.

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Stack Exchange)

Ok, it was just my misunderstanding then

8. syyskuuta 2020 klo 20.56
Sijainti: Muut: Stack Exchange
Avainsanat: Bash

@Gilles’SO-stopbeingevil’ Ok, it was just my misunderstanding then; I interpreted the quote as meaning ”you should quote RHS regular expressions”.

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Stack Exchange)

A RHS regular expression should always be unquoted (since Bash 3.2 at least)

8. syyskuuta 2020 klo 15.39
Sijainti: Muut: Stack Exchange
Avainsanat: Bash

”Except that you do need double quotes where a pattern or regular expression is expected: on the right-hand side of = or == or != or =~.” Perhaps I’m misunderstanding this, but AFAIK, a RHS regular expression (i.e. after =~) should always be unquoted (since Bash 3.2 at least).

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Stack Exchange)

Perhaps related: Bug 626427 – Frequent dhclient DHCPREQUEST messages in syslog

6. joulukuuta 2018 klo 19.07
Sijainti: Muut: Stack Exchange
Avainsanat: CentOS, Red Hat

Perhaps related: RH Bug 626427 – Frequent dhclient DHCPREQUEST messages in syslog

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Stack Exchange)

None of these work with NFS mountpoints

8. syyskuuta 2017 klo 15.51
Sijainti: Muut: Stack Exchange
Avainsanat: NFS

None of these work with NFS mountpoints.

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Stack Exchange)

You can tell syntastic which checkers to run via a variable

28. toukokuuta 2017 klo 17.58
Sijainti: Muut: Stack Exchange
Avainsanat: Vim

From what romainl only linked to (the relevant parts of links should be quoted when answering):

You can tell syntastic which checkers to run for a given filetype by setting a variable ’g:syntastic__checkers’ to a list of checkers, e.g.
let g:syntastic_php_checkers = [”php”, ”phpcs”, ”phpmd”]

As for your question about invocation: according to the FAQ, the ”command line is constructed using an internal function named makeprgBuild(), which provides a number of options that allow you to customise every part of the command that gets run. You can set these options using global variables”. (See this answer.)

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Stack Exchange)

But how does the latter scenario differ

21. toukokuuta 2017 klo 19.29
Sijainti: Muut: Stack Exchange
Avainsanat: UNIX

But how does the latter scenario differ from one where `mktemp` is invoked without `-u`? Even if the file is created (as opposed to just the name), nothing prevents another process from writing to the same file once it has been created.

Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Stack Exchange)

Vanhempia »