Not speaking for The Chromium Projects or anyone, but I think the things you mention are just not considered issues to be addressed in the project. The Chromium Projects are, by their own words, ”open-source”, which by FSF’s definition (as also mentioned in one of the threads you linked to) is different from free software. Barring any actual non-free licensing issues, any party with an interest to do so should, in my understanding, be able to branch a new project from Chromium and address those issues, turning their branched codebase into what the FSF and Trisquel would then consider free enough to qualify.
In other words, these aren’t issues to be fixed ”by Chromium”, but by parties with an interest to have them fixed. And at least according to G4JC at the aforementioned thread, it would be quite a substantial amount of work to be done.
Are their names supposed to be redacted? ’Cause I can read them just fine through the red strikethroughs.
Has anyone ever found themselves thinking anything beyond the apps and perhaps the files lenses are useful? Only half /s here, I love Unity as much as the next guy (maybe even more), but perhaps my workflow is just stuck in the past as I never even touch the Dash unless I need an app not currently locked to my Launcher. The first thing I do after installing a recent release is a big apt-get –purge for all other scopes, just to better see those apps which are all I (ever) need.
Ehkä siltä oli sienet loppu. Jonnet ei muista…
I would highly recommend Daniel’s much simpler solution over the one currently selected as correct:
$user = get_userdata( $user_id );
if ( $user == false ) {
//user id does not exist
} else {
//user id exists
}
This does work in browsers (both desktop and mobile as you said), but not in the G+ app which is a bummer.
Olen kahden vaiheilla tästä. Melkein kaikki Vartiotorni-seuran tuottama on enemmän dadaa kuin Lehti, joten koko aliredditin voisi hukuttaa juttuihin sieltä – jolloin vitsi lakkaisi hyvin pian huvittamasta.