Alright, I finally managed to get through the signup
@amyblais Alright, I finally managed to get through the signup. Here’s my suggestion, although it’s in moderation for now, so the link probably won’t work until it’s approved.
@amyblais Alright, I finally managed to get through the signup. Here’s my suggestion, although it’s in moderation for now, so the link probably won’t work until it’s approved.
A ”Mark read” choice in push notifications about new messages, as seen in many IM apps, would be handy in Mattermost Mobile too. Currently the message can only be marked read by tapping the message to open the app (which is slow).
Vastaa viestiin sen kontekstissa (Mattermost Feature Idea Forum)
Hi @amyblais,
I could post this on the feature idea forum, but I can’t figure out how the signup on the site works. When I click on ”Create an account”, I get a prompt to verify my email address, and having done that, a page saying ”Go back to Production to finish logging in”. I don’t know what ”Production” is, and at no point was there any actual way to set up a password, so I can’t log in.
A ”Mark read” choice in push notifications about new messages, as seen in many IM apps, would be handy in Mattermost Mobile too. Currently the message can only be marked read by tapping the message to open the app (which is slow).
Have a ”Mark read” option underneath the expanded notification.
No ”Mark read” option, only ”Reply”.
I was on my Android device, saving URLs pointing to individual comments in threads at Ubiquiti’s Unifi forums, but later returning to them on my desktop realized that the hash (fragment) portion had been dropped, so that the URLs only pointed to the opening post. Hence, just one link (pointing to the first post) had been saved. This is pretty useless for threads spanning multiple pages, where finding an individual comment is tough without the exact link.
Here’s a (random) example of a URL pointing to the second comment on the third page of one thread. Sharing it from any of Android, iPhone or desktop results in a link pointing to the first post instead.
== System information ==
Ubuntu 23.10, up to date before today’s updates.
== Steps to reproduce (WIP) ==
0. have a group of packages that are kept back from updating, plus some that aren’t (screenshot demonstration attached) below
1. open update-manager
2. (try to) open the kept group, click on their (unchecked) checkboxes
3. do the same for some of the other, non-kept packages
4. repeat 2.-3. for a while
== What happens ==
Update-manager becomes unresponsive, then eventually segfaults:
update-manager[3292]: segfault at 30 ip 00007fc0718b4c41 sp 00007ffc2cca6a68 error 4 in libgobject-2.0.so.0.7800.0[7fc071889000+34000] likely on CPU 4 (core 0, socket 0)
== Other info ==
I’ve marked the steps above WIP because these are the conditions under which I found this today, but I haven’t yet tried narrowing them down, because of course I have little control over which updates are available. (For instance, the kept packages might just be a red herring.)
I initially tried to report the crash file with ubuntu-bug, but despite asking preliminary questions, in the end it never opened a browser to complete the report. I’ll try apport-collect next, but if that fails too, I’ll just attach the crash file here manually.
For Ubuntu 23.10, open a terminal and run `gnome-extensions disable ding@rastersoft.com`
My Year in review stats are different depending on which device I view them on, which I think must be unintentional. For instance, the very first page says I’ve listened to ”66 different shows and 215 episodes in total” on my Android phone, ”96 different shows and 752 episodes” on my Android tablet, and ”96 different shows and 762 episodes in total” on my iPhone.
My most listened show is RA Podcast according to both the iPhone and the tablet, though they again disagree on the total listening time, whereas my Android phone says my most listened show is Let’s Talk About Sects. The entire list of most listened shows is completely different too.
I can provide screenshots if needed. I’m submitting this report from the web UI, though I haven’t found the year in review feature here, so I can’t say if it is similarly affected.
Näyttää selaimessa vanhaa selkeämmältä ja paremmalta, mutta tästä puuttuu reseptiyhteenvedon tulostaminen, joka on yksi minulle tärkeimmistä toiminnoista vanhassa (ruukaan tulostaa yhteenvedon PDF-tiedostoon, jotta voin tarkistaa jäljellä olleet määrät ilman, että tarvitsee kirjautua). Se ei haittaisi, jos tämä uuden näkymä olisi tällaisenaan nätisti tulostuva, mutta tässä ei ilmeisesti ole tulostusta ajateltu vielä ollenkaan, vaan tulosteeseen tulee valikkoa ja muuta turhaa roskaa.
Paljon onnea parikymppiselle! Kohti seuraavia kymmenlukuja!